You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The use of CC-BY-SA-2.5 in those files only pertains to docstrings/comments. Would it be feasible for you to strip them, or would that cause problems due to checksums?
Also, is the problem with any CC-BY-SA, or just version 2.5? The MDN states that
"CC-BY-SA 2.5 or later" subsumes "CC-BY-SA 4.0". I don't see why we'd have to make it stricter than necessary. You're free to call it CC-BY-SA 4.0 on your end.
Activity
dominikh commentedon Feb 10, 2025
Hi.
The use of CC-BY-SA-2.5 in those files only pertains to docstrings/comments. Would it be feasible for you to strip them, or would that cause problems due to checksums?
Also, is the problem with any CC-BY-SA, or just version 2.5? The MDN states that
So we should be able to update
go-js-dom/dom.go
Lines 21 to 23 in 00dae51
fvcr commentedon Feb 10, 2025
Thanks for the quick reply,
CC license in version 4.0 is considered to be compatible to the DFSG.
If you could make it clear that this is a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license, that would be great.
Thanks!
Clarify that documentation is licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.5 or later
dominikh commentedon Mar 4, 2025
@fvcr I've updated the comments. This should be acceptable for you, right?
fvcr commentedon Mar 18, 2025
Hi @dominikh, sorry for the delay.
What do you think about licensing it under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license?
dominikh commentedon Mar 18, 2025
"CC-BY-SA 2.5 or later" subsumes "CC-BY-SA 4.0". I don't see why we'd have to make it stricter than necessary. You're free to call it
CC-BY-SA 4.0on your end.